|
Post by 36cygnar24guy36 on Jan 12, 2018 13:53:16 GMT
Well they're Def 15 with free elusive, most heavies don't actually kill one guaranteed in an activation. They trade up really well (or nearly evenly with Khador heavies which is great, but they're a lot faster). I've killed 4 Khador heavies in a turn by waterfalling my sprints to enable more flanks, before porting Una back to safety with stones. She also has crazy assassination threat vs the majority of such lists. Fair enough
|
|
demonic
Junior Strategist
Posts: 649
|
Post by demonic on Jan 17, 2018 1:38:32 GMT
that's mathematics at work there. The average MAT for a heavy hitter is still 6-7, having def 15 makes them have to boost to hit, grinding down how many attacks they can buy. In our meta (oh god those guys are gonna be so butt hurt tomorrow for coming in 3rd and 5th ha ha) has quite an established rule of thumb in doing whatever is necessary to force a person to spend focus and fury points. Khador is great at doing this with armor and forcing anything that doesn't have a pow 16+ weapon to boost damage, while Circle is great at doing it on defense vs mat and rat.
|
|
|
Post by macdaddy on Jan 17, 2018 2:40:27 GMT
that's mathematics at work there. The average MAT for a heavy hitter is still 6-7, having def 15 makes them have to boost to hit, grinding down how many attacks they can buy. In our meta (oh god those guys are gonna be so butt hurt tomorrow for coming in 3rd and 5th ha ha) has quite an established rule of thumb in doing whatever is necessary to force a person to spend focus and fury points. Khador is great at doing this with armor and forcing anything that doesn't have a pow 16+ weapon to boost damage, while Circle is great at doing it on defense vs mat and rat. Unless your opponent has a mt fixer, or knockdown...or stationary. I seem to have horrible luck relying on def skew. Pretty much anything under def 16 is unreliable for me. Even def 15 gets killed by those raw dog 8's...*sigh*
|
|
|
ATC Lists
Jan 17, 2018 5:58:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by elshinare on Jan 17, 2018 5:58:18 GMT
So many things can drop def but few things in circle raises it, I'd be happy with something that boosted our def +2 or 3 instead of all the armor buffs
|
|
demonic
Junior Strategist
Posts: 649
|
Post by demonic on Jan 17, 2018 6:53:03 GMT
mmm this is something that circle players really don't realize and is why they get dragged down so often. We like to complain about our threat range, yet the major threat ranges are, in general, guns which are useless against stealth or units that are behind forests, even just concealment or cover is huge on negating all range but sprays and we can freely spawn forests and rough ground with ease. Even better, we have several models with "outs" that let them see through forests like it wasn't even there. Tharn models that receive plus 2 def in melee when in a forest... *murmurs about circle beasts without pathfinder*
We don't need things like blur because the only way to shoot our models is usually with combined ranged attacks or uber boosted shots. *points at stalker prowl + Kaya3 conceal* We also have the doggies that are rather cheap and have kick ass animi that the enemy NEEDS to take out early. Proper circle play involves tossing 2 or 3 doggies or cheepo griffons purposely in alpha range of their longer ranged models and letting them be your sacrificial pawns. Behind them, out of range, is YOUR alpha, consisting of wolves, satyrs, and griffons. Next turn, you get the alpha on the units they alpha'd to kill the bait, since if they don't take the chance when they are exposed, they are going to need a hammer to get at them later. If their intention is to ignore your bait, use them for a quick and easy assassination run, as Def 5 casters and character models make easy prey when you combine it with one of our numerous shifting tricks.
Armor boosting our living beasts is actually rather wise if you are good at bait and switch tactics. even +3 def isn't going to stop someone from spending any more focus/fury as they already would when facing a def 13+ model. On the other hand, having 20 arm forces the majority of beasts and casters to need to spend ANOTHER focus/fury on boosting damage for every swing they take. It's the same with our infantry, we are already high enough def to force boosts, but you need over 16 arm to force boosted damage roles.
ON THE OTHER HAND! Wold beasts that already have high armor (or ways to obtain high armor) already have enough that a light def boost would be more beneficial. That is all just math and average benefits. What sits across from you on the other side of the table can change the whole thing around. Look at Khador, since they only have an armor skew people have easily prepared full anti-armor, low mat/rat lists that rip Khador apart (none for circle yet unfortunately) and have been keeping them on the lower end of the winning spectrum as of late... and ONLY as of late (like all other generally OP factions, the moment they get butt hurt they get a CID or some model that makes them OP again)
|
|
|
Post by jisidro on Jan 17, 2018 9:22:55 GMT
that's mathematics at work there. The average MAT for a heavy hitter is still 6-7, having def 15 makes them have to boost to hit, grinding down how many attacks they can buy. In our meta (oh god those guys are gonna be so butt hurt tomorrow for coming in 3rd and 5th ha ha) has quite an established rule of thumb in doing whatever is necessary to force a person to spend focus and fury points. Khador is great at doing this with armor and forcing anything that doesn't have a pow 16+ weapon to boost damage, while Circle is great at doing it on defense vs mat and rat. Unless your opponent has a mt fixer, or knockdown...or stationary. I seem to have horrible luck relying on def skew. Pretty much anything under def 16 is unreliable for me. Even def 15 gets killed by those raw dog 8's...*sigh* ARM 13 destroys the effect of forcing boosts... If you're hitting an ARM 13 22box model with pow 18 you don't need more than 2 attacks... And as macdady said boosted 8s are a good bet. Still there is no denying that Una2 and Scarsfell did great and will likely continue to do so.
|
|
|
Post by jisidro on Jan 17, 2018 9:25:05 GMT
Here is my collection from the ATC results:
W L % Baldur2 3 6 33% Grayle1 3 2 60% Kaya3 1 1 50% Kromac2 1 0 100% Kruegr1 2 3 40% Kruegr2 4 4 50% Mohsar1 1 8 11% Thorle1 4 13 24% Una2 12 1 92% Wurmwood1 2 0 100%
It includes mirror matches.
Brad did a lot worse than I thought he would and Una2 a lot better...
|
|
|
Post by macdaddy on Jan 17, 2018 13:46:15 GMT
that...does not look like a good spread.
Kromac 2 we should probably discount percentage wise because he was only played once lol. Kruger 2 with a 50% rate seems odd. I expected slightly better. Una 2....wow.... Mohsar makes my heart sad. Bradugus is really...confusing. I wish we had more info on the match ups there. 3 of those wins was from just 1 player that means everyone else got molested.
I really want to know what the match ups were and what happened there. I knew Brad did not come out of CiD as strong as he should have, but that just seems awful.
Based on this our only reliable casters are kruger2, Wumrwood, Una2, and Grayle.
|
|
|
Post by maplewhisky on Jan 17, 2018 15:31:43 GMT
It's my personal opinion that Brad isn't that good, he's not nearly as good as he was in mk2, in faction basically a worse version of Una and he's still very complicated to pilot. Without sounding mean, unless you're a very good player you will probably mess playing Brad up and considering he's not that strong and very easy to assassinate... yeah that seems about right.
I'd be quite interested in the stats for Circle warlocks only in the X-0 or X-1 bracket.
Edit: Also demonic sometimes I think you play a different game from us bud. Your posts often come across a little.... crazy.
|
|
|
Post by gordaunikus1 on Jan 17, 2018 19:41:55 GMT
My 2 cents: - I went 2-1 with Baldur2 and brainfarted in a really close game on the game I lost against the winning team from Cali (opponent was awesome). With 2 wayfarers, 3 shapers, and 3 geomancers, he has a weirdly specific kit that worked out fine. Even into bad matchups (of which there are plenty), it seems you can dig your way out by staying alive and spraying your ass off. - Throw out those wurmwood wins. I posted this in facebook (still on that post con/tourny high), but that list can only assassinate and I think high level players just wouldn't get assassinated by it. conflictchamber.com/#c8201b_-0p5C4QjGjGjFjFg4g4g45g5ghm5e5e5f5f___-0p5vjFjF4H4H4Hg45g5gfI0U5e5e5f5fi7
|
|
xadmar
Junior Strategist
Posts: 173
|
Post by xadmar on Jan 18, 2018 17:16:52 GMT
Are those 3 Brad wins by midgetmerc? He posted his Brad & Brun thoughts in a different post. I think any team tourney results are a little off skew just by the fact people get to pick matchups and can adjust their list with that knowledge. All Hail Queen 2una
|
|
|
Post by jisidro on Jan 19, 2018 14:59:39 GMT
Are those 3 Brad wins by midgetmerc? He posted his Brad & Brun thoughts in a different post. I think any team tourney results are a little off skew just by the fact people get to pick matchups and can adjust their list with that knowledge. All Hail Queen 2una
Both sides can do that. Some pairs are better in teams because you can dodge while in singles you can't but a bad caster/list in singles is a bad caster/list in teams and a good caster/list in singles is a good caster/list in teams.
|
|
|
Post by potato on Jan 19, 2018 16:16:31 GMT
Eric Mack's Una2 list is the one for me. With +1 to go first that is downright nasty. Being able to funnel it away from its few bad matchups is even better.
|
|
demonic
Junior Strategist
Posts: 649
|
Post by demonic on Jan 19, 2018 21:33:50 GMT
from our players that went, they said that 80% of the competition didn't have serious lists. When I looked at the lists for ATC I was also pretty appalled. the majority of the brad lists didn't take advantage of his capabilities at ALL so the players who had those lists probably didn't know how to take advantage of brad's abilities either.
|
|
|
ATC Lists
Jan 20, 2018 19:18:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by kuririnad on Jan 20, 2018 19:18:16 GMT
I feel like that's a terribly offensive thing to say about dozens of people you never met, many of whom probably read these forums 🙁
|
|