cain
Junior Strategist
Posts: 243
|
Post by cain on Mar 7, 2019 0:04:41 GMT
The complete rules are now in the CID forum.
So should i pair haley3 with sylvestro ? I hope they have a long CID cycle for this one....
|
|
|
Post by smoothcriminal on Mar 7, 2019 0:19:03 GMT
Yeah, they don't give a damn. Even gw doesn't do this anymore outside of casual "anything goes" play. I think it's wise to boycott the cid until this gets removed.
|
|
|
Post by josephkerr on Mar 7, 2019 0:22:33 GMT
Wow a beta test contains some broken mechanic and everyone throws their shit against the wall and curses the developer for even trying something in the first place. How dare PP test their rules! Burn the company down! Please start the picket line when these rules are tournament legal.
|
|
|
Post by trollsareblue on Mar 7, 2019 0:38:39 GMT
Wow a beta test contains some broken mechanic and everyone throws their shit against the wall and curses the developer for even trying something in the first place. How dare PP test their rules! Burn the company down! Please start the picket line when these rules are tournament legal. OK. As is, Hearts of Darkness is obviously broken. Why waste the community's time with that garbage? Why waste development and testing time?
|
|
|
Post by Havock on Mar 7, 2019 0:46:57 GMT
Also, it can be a test run for something else they have in mind.
|
|
|
Post by josephkerr on Mar 7, 2019 0:55:31 GMT
Wow a beta test contains some broken mechanic and everyone throws their shit against the wall and curses the developer for even trying something in the first place. How dare PP test their rules! Burn the company down! Please start the picket line when these rules are tournament legal. OK. As is, Hearts of Darkness is obviously broken. Why waste the community's time with that garbage? Why waste development and testing time? They arent wasting anyones time. Were beta testers. We get things to test and report how and why they break/work. They dont “owe” the community mostly functional things that can fly straight to shelves. Right now everyone is rushing to put the most broken combos together and thats great data. What if its not all models or interractions? What if theres a more limited list of warcasters that would work fine? What if there are fun things about the lists that can be toned down and salvaged something else?
|
|
|
Post by Charistoph on Mar 7, 2019 1:14:03 GMT
It seriously could just end up being that this will be set up allowing them to be the 2nd Warcasters in the group, alal Mercs, when it hits final release.
|
|
|
Post by autocorrecthaslimits on Mar 7, 2019 1:14:36 GMT
OK. As is, Hearts of Darkness is obviously broken. Why waste the community's time with that garbage? Why waste development and testing time? They arent wasting anyones time. Were beta testers. We get things to test and report how and why they break/work. They dont “owe” the community mostly functional things that can fly straight to shelves. Right now everyone is rushing to put the most broken combos together and thats great data. What if its not all models or interractions? What if theres a more limited list of warcasters that would work fine? What if there are fun things about the lists that can be toned down and salvaged something else? I dont usually throw my hat into these things, but all I see on our local facebook and other forums is discussion of this theme. Which likely means the first week of cid will be spent on a theme and less on the actual faction identity of masters and horrors. Which is a shame, I was liking the ideal and mechanics of (relative) scrub beasts/infantry backed by super solos and casters. Then the theme drops and I get its not its final form but leaves a sour taste in many peoples mouth, including mine. Cherrypicking a 2 casters pairing, each having 3 extra units (1 faction/1 merc) 4 solos and then infernal options per list as a possible SR pairing? No way that can be playtested fully in 3 weeks. And kinda defeats the purpose of playing a "faction" imho. One of the reasons I came to WMH was disliking the 40k soup of knights, knights, and bannana boys. But thats just my view and kneejerk response. I'm no super comp player, but I dont see how this can come out and not just end up with players having to deal with myriad combos baked up every release cycle They could have done a sercret masters theme at launch, then later tested this theme. Just my two cents
|
|
|
Post by onijet01 on Mar 7, 2019 1:17:32 GMT
Personally i have been waiting for the infernals to be in warmahordes sense back in 2012. As gammers it is our privlage to test games and machanics.
At first look (even with combos) nothing looks to over the top. The faction at large appears to be a synergized army. Similar to both Cephalyx/convergence hybrid army.
Both theme forces fo not seem over the top. As each has a fair balanced benifits.
So outside a individuals natural aversion to change why are they broken?
And yes i understand infernal summon machanic
|
|
Ganso
Junior Strategist
Posts: 932
|
Post by Ganso on Mar 7, 2019 1:43:10 GMT
But ignoring the fact that the Devs actually said on stream not to get excited about the Hearts of Darkness because there was a non zero chance of not even being released, What does this even mean in the context of CiD where people have to construct lists and spend time to test them? So now PP just literally tosses things at random for people to test that may not get released? I'm sorry, I totally forgot that people play CID games with a gun to their head.
|
|
|
Post by trollsareblue on Mar 7, 2019 2:30:49 GMT
What does this even mean in the context of CiD where people have to construct lists and spend time to test them? So now PP just literally tosses things at random for people to test that may not get released? I'm sorry, I totally forgot that people play CID games with a gun to their head. Player1: That seems OP. Rando: TEST IT FIRST Player2: How did that make it out of CID? Rando: YOU SHOULD HAVE HELPED TEST THEN!
|
|
|
Post by josephkerr on Mar 7, 2019 2:43:11 GMT
Here’s Soles response on the theme, and I think its a good directional note for the testing. “The theme force is a toolbox. As we discover unintended or broken interactions we will move to address them. That will likely necessitate the theme becoming less general and more restrictive. One possible direction we could move in is something more like the Llaelese theme force. That is not our preferred direction at his time however.”
Tl;dr Bring us the most broken crap you can think of and try it.
|
|
cain
Junior Strategist
Posts: 243
|
Post by cain on Mar 7, 2019 8:42:16 GMT
We are not only talking about a new mini faction, but they are throwing in also another minifaction and the backlog of 2 of the big factions with tons of casters/units/models. You also have the new phenomen of a 2 list pair which are a combination of 2 factions. The problem with a CID on this a couple of weeks, is that time is too limited.
I really dont like the design choice either. PP reduced the cross faction synergy when mrk3 started, with the nerf to usage of merc/minion in other faction. This has been taken further with thememachine, which limit access to merc/minions in other factions themes.
Part of the vocal reason for thememachine from PP has also been that themes makes it easier to balance stuff and "box in" a limited amount of models.
This new infernal theme seems to go the straight oposite direction - mix everything.
|
|
|
Post by beardmonk on Mar 7, 2019 8:53:44 GMT
Re Hearts of Darkness. Does this mean that in order to play Infernals to their full extent, i.e. both themes, you also need to buy a fairly significant Khador/Cygnar/CG army?
When they said that infernals had sleeper agents I assumed that there would be a number of individual casters or solos that could be played cross faction. Not entire factions playing in Infernals.
|
|
cain
Junior Strategist
Posts: 243
|
Post by cain on Mar 7, 2019 8:59:21 GMT
Re Hearts of Darkness. Does this mean that in order to play Infernals to their full extent, i.e. both themes, you also need to buy a fairly significant Khador/Cygnar/CG army? When they said that infernals had sleeper agents I assumed that there would be a number of individual casters or solos that could be played cross faction. Not entire factions playing in Infernals.
Yes. Taken in extreme you need full cygnar, khador and CG army. Of course with several of each units. :-)
The only good thing i see, is that all those cygnar/khador second hand armies with 70 % off on internet, may sell at last.
This of course with the caveat that it gets through CID... So don't buy yet !
|
|