|
|
Post by schostoppa1 on Apr 5, 2017 19:00:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Morganstern on Apr 5, 2017 20:09:43 GMT
Very interested in the discussion about Banes. I'm also interested in what other models they want to look at along side battle engines. Hopefully recursion and spell slave will get attention.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swampmist on Apr 5, 2017 20:12:55 GMT
Very interested in the discussion about Banes. I'm also interested in what other models they want to look at along side battle engines. Hopefully recursion and spell slave will get attention. Very unlikely. The bane tests are because of the new bane theme, so it will be heavily focused on that. |
|
|
|
Post by Morganstern on Apr 5, 2017 20:58:34 GMT
One can always dream. Recursion has hampered Cryx infantry but has destroyed CoC infantry.
|
|
|
|
Post by schostoppa1 on Apr 5, 2017 21:22:10 GMT
Agreed. CoC infantry got crippled with recursion.
|
|
joedj
Junior Strategist
Posts: 513 
|
Post by joedj on Apr 6, 2017 1:35:31 GMT
I'm excited about CID: Battle Engines and Banes.
Grymkin/Steamroller I'll leave to others.
|
|
regleant
Junior Strategist
Sometimes things go right
Posts: 267
|
Post by regleant on Apr 6, 2017 4:38:48 GMT
I am excited for a new Steamroller and having new challenges on the table top. Best of all, no more Linebreaker to worry about!
|
|
cain
Junior Strategist
Posts: 243
|
Post by cain on Apr 6, 2017 8:05:47 GMT
I am excited for a new Steamroller and having new challenges on the table top. Best of all, no more Linebreaker to worry about! After attending lots of tournaments i havent sees linebreaker ever used. Think i have played it once in a friendly game to try it right after the packaged dropped.
Look forwards to the new CIDs though. Missions seems even more craxy now than linebreaker
|
|
|
|
Post by Swampmist on Apr 6, 2017 13:53:56 GMT
I played it in the team event at adepticon; Assassination with flags
|
|
Grimolf
Junior Strategist
Posts: 246
|
Post by Grimolf on Apr 6, 2017 15:10:49 GMT
The active Dev Talk thread on banes will be interesting. It sounds like PP is making an effort to reach out to Cryx and hear their concerns about a favorite unit. Hopefully comments from the community will check the salt and focus on solutions.
|
|
spideredd
Junior Strategist
Summer Gamer
Posts: 588
|
Post by spideredd on Apr 6, 2017 16:27:06 GMT
The active Dev Talk thread on banes will be interesting. It sounds like PP is making an effort to reach out to Cryx and hear their concerns about a favorite unit. Hopefully comments from the community will check the salt and focus on solutions. I certainly do hope so. |
|
|
|
Post by tiberius on Apr 6, 2017 16:39:51 GMT
I am also looking forward to the battle engine CID, if they cost as much as character heavies, they should at least be as survivable or have the board presence to match. And I am excited to see what they do with banes, but to be honest, after the last errata, I am fine with them.
|
|
|
|
Post by whiskeydave on Apr 6, 2017 16:59:48 GMT
exciting times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gaston on Apr 8, 2017 3:30:38 GMT
I am excited for a new Steamroller and having new challenges on the table top. Best of all, no more Linebreaker to worry about! What should be more concerning is how negative the Sr16 beta feedback was for Linebreaker and how they ignored it. Still salty. |
|
