shmeep
Junior Strategist
Posts: 742
|
Post by shmeep on Sept 20, 2019 18:09:28 GMT
Can I ask a dumb question of the OP? Is there a joke I'm missing for the odd typing? Is it supposed to be an Ork thing? Now that I've seen it, I can't stop wondering about it. no p.s. Gotta love how this turned from an obvious shitpost/bait into a contest to see who can get the most bitter about their faction.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 20, 2019 19:38:45 GMT
dat anecdope was not verry amusing! also eh can stil do dat and 18 18 2 camp is supar kilable Shoe, you’re even loonier than you pretend to be if you actually think that an 18/18/17-box no-KD caster on 2 camp is or should be “super killable” from 19” away with a single model’s activation. : p
|
|
zhoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 254
|
Post by zhoe on Sept 20, 2019 19:57:44 GMT
dat anecdope was not verry amusing! also eh can stil do dat and 18 18 2 camp is supar kilable Shoe, you’re even loonier than you pretend to be if you actually think that an 18/18/17-box no-KD caster on 2 camp is or should be “super killable” from 19” away with a single model’s activation. : p wat u ar sayin is litl ol caine was standin 7" off teh bord centar at the end of his turn and u was powerlass to do anythin bout it cept cry nurf i shal recount for u a hihly amusing Antidote of wen i had asslyn in ruble at def 21 on her feet turn and den teh lylyth3 palayer sez I ONLY NEEDS A 13 ON 3 TRYES IF I SNIPES and i died so clearly dey gots to do somethi. about dat bidness rite der
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 20, 2019 20:42:47 GMT
Shoe, you’re even loonier than you pretend to be if you actually think that an 18/18/17-box no-KD caster on 2 camp is or should be “super killable” from 19” away with a single model’s activation. : p wat u ar sayin is litl ol caine was standin 7" off teh bord centar at the end of his turn and u was powerlass to do anythin bout it cept cry nurf i shal recount for u a hihly amusing Antidote of wen i had asslyn in ruble at def 21 on her feet turn and den teh lylyth3 palayer sez I ONLY NEEDS A 13 ON 3 TRYES IF I SNIPES and i died so clearly dey gots to do somethi. about dat bidness rite der Not that engaging with you ever results in a productive outcome, but: there’s a distinct quantitative difference between “somebody got lucky and rolled high to hit against a caster that is all DEF and no ARM” and “point-and-click assassination enabled because 1 attacker can put 18 damage rolls into a single target, 9 of which completely circumvent all defensive tech in the game.” Alternatively: “my name is shoe, one time I lost a game against a mannequin.”
|
|
|
Post by droopingpuppy on Sept 20, 2019 21:00:17 GMT
Sez you! To a non-trivial degree, this forum is just the cesspit where all the angry-at-Privateer-over- whatever people congregate in order to bounce their vitriol around an echo chamber so they can believe everyone shares their points of view. You have people actively advocating for Privateer to fail because somehow that will “fix” the game according to their twisted logic, because that makes sense. Elsewhere, people are genuinely happy with the game and enjoying it, and I can only hope their first introduction to the game is not behavior like we have in this thread, because nothing will cause this doom-and-gloom prophecy to self-fulfill faster. Nobody is advocating for PP to fail.
Some people are saying PP is making mistakes. But thats not what this thread is about. its about just which casters you think are bad.
This. Although many people in here are got angry aganist PP, due to the reason of the foundation of this forum, but that's not the point on the thread. And, well, I hate PP right now, sure, for it is not a secret. But, hey, if I just want to quit the game and don't want to ever look back I didn't join the forum either. I don't think that most of 'PP Haters' in Lormahordes are far from that. Anyway, back to the topic, Blaize still don't doing well. Actually some point of her change is even worse. Well, finally she have some Morrowan stuffs, especially for non-fragile melee unit. But she provide not much of a merit for them. She may give some of, but most Cygnar or Mercenary casters are already do far better than her. Although he is nerfed to the ground, at least Caine2 is a super solo, that still works similar to MKII ways. But you know, Blaize is even worse than her MKII debut version in overall. Is it even a match? I don't think so. Ha, at least on her first version in Wrath there is a way to play her in Mercenary, although it was mediocre and corner cased solution. For now, taking her means you are taunt the opponent that you can win a game without a warcaster, for she is like as a Solo model with 10+ damage box and Battlegroup Controller with FOCUS 6. Yes, she would be a super solo, but in the game that everyone have a warcastet or a warlock she can't give any merit over forfeit that.
|
|
zhoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 254
|
Post by zhoe on Sept 20, 2019 21:50:30 GMT
wat u ar sayin is litl ol caine was standin 7" off teh bord centar at the end of his turn and u was powerlass to do anythin bout it cept cry nurf i shal recount for u a hihly amusing Antidote of wen i had asslyn in ruble at def 21 on her feet turn and den teh lylyth3 palayer sez I ONLY NEEDS A 13 ON 3 TRYES IF I SNIPES and i died so clearly dey gots to do somethi. about dat bidness rite der Not that engaging with you ever results in a productive outcome, but: there’s a distinct quantitative difference between “somebody got lucky and rolled high to hit against a caster that is all DEF and no ARM” and “point-and-click assassination enabled because 1 attacker can put 18 damage rolls into a single target, 9 of which completely circumvent all defensive tech in the game.” Alternatively: “my name is shoe, one time I lost a game against a mannequin.” i dunno if u hav evar reades cain2s feat it is called 'overkoll') but it doesnt do any of thies things dat u ar saying it does do so u may hav been hornswoggled by this fell9w
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 20, 2019 22:19:36 GMT
Not that engaging with you ever results in a productive outcome, but: there’s a distinct quantitative difference between “somebody got lucky and rolled high to hit against a caster that is all DEF and no ARM” and “point-and-click assassination enabled because 1 attacker can put 18 damage rolls into a single target, 9 of which completely circumvent all defensive tech in the game.” Alternatively: “my name is shoe, one time I lost a game against a mannequin.” i dunno if u hav evar reades cain2s feat it is called 'overkoll') but it doesnt do any of thies things dat u ar saying it does do so u may hav been hornswoggled by this fell9w Now it doesn’t. But it used to, hence the “nerf”. See, this is why that mannequin tabled you, dude. I know, I know, you keep saying you were distracted by all of that potted plant’s trash talk, but frankly I question that narrative.
|
|
|
Post by dogganmguest on Sept 20, 2019 22:36:33 GMT
What was the magic brokenness that let Caine2 put 18 damage rolls on the same target? I'm looking at the original command book, which is pretty close to the original mk3 Caine2, and the only errata note from back then was a change to make him pay for his shot rules.
|
|
zhoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 254
|
Post by zhoe on Sept 20, 2019 22:46:39 GMT
What was the magic brokenness that let Caine2 put 18 damage rolls on the same target? I'm looking at the original command book, which is pretty close to the original mk3 Caine2, and the only errata note from back then was a change to make him pay for his shot rules. jes. i m looking at mk2 cygnor book rite now and it has nevar changed except things bont splode now when dey die and michel is a silly fellow who gets hronswoggled by n00bs
|
|
|
Post by kjata on Sept 20, 2019 22:48:47 GMT
IIRC you used to be able to trick shot into the same model.
|
|
|
Post by dogganmguest on Sept 20, 2019 23:03:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 21, 2019 0:55:46 GMT
IIRC you used to be able to trick shot into the same model. This is correct. Then I guess this happened before that errata. Or, you know: there was a flood* of rules questions right after release, and it's entirely possible that somebody missed something the moment they blinked. Regardless, the original point still stands: the MK III release Caine2 was capable of putting 18 damage rolls into the same model. The card didn't change until the January 2017 errata. * And if you don't believe me: I count 580 separate rules forum threads answered in the month of June 2016 alone.
|
|
zhoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 254
|
Post by zhoe on Sept 21, 2019 2:22:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 21, 2019 3:03:58 GMT
I actually had this funny scene all typed up that cast you as an impoverished child on one of those heartstring-tugging “please give now” commercials, futilely struggling to understand math in your run-down one-room school, but skip that for now. I think we’re back to typical shoe-trolling. Two initials, plus six focus, plus one more focus from the Squire equals nine shots. Add a free Trick Shot from each hit, and that makes 9+9=18 damage rolls. Also, aha: you’re the source of the leaked cards prior to the MK III release. It’s your fault.
|
|
zhoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 254
|
Post by zhoe on Sept 21, 2019 3:13:14 GMT
I actually had this funny scene all typed up that cast you as an impoverished child on one of those heartstring-tugging “please give now” commercials, futilely struggling to understand math in your run-down one-room school, but skip that for now. I think we’re back to typical shoe-trolling. Two initials, plus six focus, plus one more focus from the Squire equals nine shots. Add a free Trick Shot from each hit, and that makes 9+9=18 damage rolls. Also, aha: you’re the source of the leaked cards prior to the MK III release. It’s your fault. trick shots ar alwez pow 10 and he stil neds 9s to hit def 18. ur still tellin stories. teh feay was not nurfed except for losin teh bad ol blast. it didn never ignor no defansiv tech i dunno wat ur even tryin to prov at dis point except for u didnt read teh card and got bamboozled by dis one guy once upon a tiem
|
|