Cryx and SR2017

Kraken with 5'' AoE becoming more viable for Fuel Cache
Bunker nerf is sad

Fuel Cache making it through unchanged is really really bad for us, and for infantry in general. Satyxis Raiders suddenly die to blasts 66% of the time, casters like Deneghra1, Coven, or either Skarre become super vulnerable to any single gun that can manage to hit them, and any model that can put out multiple AoEs like a Redeemer or Colossals/Gargantuans rip through even our highest armored troops like Banes pretty trivially. This is especially important when considering things like the upcoming Wraith Engine CID, as the currently spoiled Unhallowed will give us +2 Armor vs ranged and magic, but will not give undead +2 armor vs continuous fire. All of a sudden those guns & blasts our new Wraith Engine was allowing our undead to survive thanks to blast immunity and +2 armor just burn to death on our turn 66% of the time instead.

The Bunker changes are actually great for Ghost Fleet. With the current changes Deneghra1 will be able to shoot every objective to death with guns instead of needing to commit to melee to deal with them. This is fantastic for her scenario game.

Love the terrain changes, especially the ones about fog and burning earth not expiring. These are definitely going to help Cryx out in the long run.

I'm not sure how my army composition is going to change based on the new scenarios yet. With the focus on having multiple jacks for scenario I might switch over my Warjack load out, pulling out combat heavies in favor of two lights just to have more scenario holders, but I'll have to test how my existing lists fare into the new scenarios first. Recon definitely becomes a little harder to win on scenario for my Ghost Fleet build now that Deneghra only scores 1 point from holding the zone instead of 2, and I only have 3 jacks to control it, meaning scoring points is going to take much longer now.

Having a LoS blocking terrain feature in the middle of the table is excellent for Banes, considering that Banes can all move through even obstructions, and most LoS blocking terrain will be rough terrain or an obstruction.

You could run a feeder out of LOS to trigger Vengeance. Wouldn't work vs anyone smart, though ...

I don't consider it a bad thing, I just don't consider it excellent for banes. So my Bane Warriors are completely safe behind a house, sweet. If the house is in a location where my opponent never needs to move within 6" of it who cares. Sure my opponent threats 0" against the banes, but that doesn't really matter if the banes can't contribute anything to the fight. While the house might be protecting banes from guns it's also protecting our opponents models from bane charges. That doesn't exactly sound excellent, just okay in some situations. What does sound Excellent is parking the Hellsinger Phantom behind a forest and then walking in and killing 4 enemy infantry models as he swift hunters back behind the forest out of LoS and retaliation range, or parking 3 Revenant Crew Riflemen behind a house and shooting anything major that comes within 14" while being safe from retaliation. 

Why? The only scenario that requires you to be in the center of the board is Recon. Every other scenario has plenty of elements far enough away from the board center that you don't need to go anywhere near it, and you can still keep up on points. Hell some of the battle reports that have been posted like  cid.privateerpress.com/forum/battle-reports/battle-reports/battle-reports-steamroller-2017-week-1/7943-haley3-heavy-metal-v-absylonia1-oracles-the-pit-ii have armies that are explicitly designed to exploit that fact. 

Standoff & Spread the Net especially have so many scenario elements that you can easily build a fast and mobile list designed to run around the map scoring points where slower armies aren't, while trying to completely ignore your opponent. You can easily just ignore any part of the board you want & as long as you just project elsewhere you'll be fine Control Points wise. 

Breakdown, Outlast, & The Pit II have fewer scenario elements, but they're extremely far apart to the point where it's very easy to just pick the element that has a more favorable terrain set up for your army to hold. Forest in the center of the table that you can't really deal with or work around, not a problem, forget about the center zone for the most part and just focus on the side zones. Left side zone have terrain that massively favors your opponent. Give it to him and focus completely on the center and right zones. You only lose if you lose by 6, so as long as you're not giving away too many elements you'll be fine, or even come out ahead as most of the things your opponent puts in a zone you abandon aren't going to be contributing to attrition. 

Recon is the only scenario that forces players into the dead center of the board. It's the only scenario where avoiding the center of the board actively loses you the game, because you can't avoid the center and keep up on points.