|
Post by Netherby on Sept 15, 2017 0:33:25 GMT
So I seem to have this problem... I keep playing casters that aren't very good and which I know aren't very good through previous experiences and then are horribly disappointed when my list performs badly. I'm a reasonably good player these days, so I don't always lose with them. People make mistakes that let me dig my way out of a loss, but I still know the list was performing poorly. The main problem here is that I'm not getting any practice with actual good lists and I like to win tournaments or at least finish in the top 3... But the disappointment is painful too I need help!
|
|
Growl
Junior Strategist
Posts: 496
|
Post by Growl on Sept 15, 2017 1:47:38 GMT
Acceptance is the first step to recovery.
|
|
|
Post by Armchair Warrior on Sept 15, 2017 1:51:25 GMT
Step 2, commit publicly to a reasonably compelling pair of casters and play them for 6 months.
Commit!
(You have until the end of September. I give you dispensation to wait until the new themes drop).
What are you playing anyway? Sorscha 2 and Old Witch 1 out of theme?
|
|
|
Post by AdeptusB on Sept 15, 2017 2:14:37 GMT
I'm an advocate of the "Play what you like and figure out how to make it work" school of WMH, so I'll be no help to you with your "problem"...
|
|
|
Post by Blargaliscious on Sept 15, 2017 3:29:53 GMT
So I seem to have this problem... We all have problems. Go on. First of all, you're being vague. Your vague question post is going to get vague answers. Creating a good army list that works well for you is part of being a good player. Notice I used the word "creating" instead of "using"? Where are you getting these poorly performing army lists from? If you are getting them from the internet - stop it. What is one man's gold is another man's garbage. So, you say that you are taking poorly performing army lists. If you know that they are stinkers, then why do you continue to use them? Seriously! This makes no sense to me. I'll say this to you: If you haven't created the army list that works well for you, getting "any practice with actual good lists" is a moot point. Find the right army list for you, then get your practice in.
|
|
|
Post by narvt86 on Sept 15, 2017 4:52:05 GMT
go with what u like , exemple i know butcher 3 is good but i dont play him WHY because hes not my play style i prefer caste like irusk even thought on some matchup B3 can be better, i dont think khador have rly bad caster either make your list with the unit you like and know pratice with it and get good at it, warmachine is a game where u mostly win on your opponed mistake if you know of too play your troop very well you wont make mistake and will be able to punish him for is.
|
|
|
Post by Netherby on Sept 15, 2017 4:57:15 GMT
Step 2, commit publicly to a reasonably compelling pair of casters and play them for 6 months. Commit! (You have until the end of September. I give you dispensation to wait until the new themes drop). What are you playing anyway? Sorscha 2 and Old Witch 1 out of theme? Guilty as charged To elaborate, I don't look for lists online *ever*. So they are all things I'v come up with, usually based around: 'I really like this caster and want to play it competitively...'
|
|
kaos
Junior Strategist
Posts: 268
|
Post by kaos on Sept 15, 2017 5:16:44 GMT
I look at lists online. Isn't really a perfect indication of what works in your meta but gives you a rough idea of what's hot and a base to staIrt building on. I usually swap some pieces but in the end you come to the conclusion the internet lists are really optimized. For example I like to play Karchev with a behemoth but after several games I concluded two other jacks will actually be better. And this is what everyone else is playing. Then there are that small adjustments like it's better two eliminators or a unit of assassins? Should I take Min or Max meks? It's better to have 2 juggernauts or 2 marauders? But that are the details you usually work out by yourself. The main weaknesses, like big b is cool but a incredible point sink, are pretty easy to spot and correct if you want to go 100% competitive.
Likewise you will probably avoid stuff like the old witch in a competitive environment and even of you don't think she is intrinsically bad, she probably need a more complex gameplay, something in a tournament with the pressure and the deathclock can't always been achieved. Sometimes pay more to use a straightforward warcaster where you can afford a couple of mistakes than a warcaster who need perfect play to deliver.
|
|
|
Post by thebuoyancyofwater on Sept 15, 2017 7:55:34 GMT
Hi,
Something that improved my list writing as really working out the goal of the list and what factions you want it to play into before it is finished. This lets you streamline the list much better. So for me, the process goes something like:
1) What is the other list? If any, this might be the first list. In which case I'd probably start by working out what are some boogymen in your meta and start with a list you feel gives you a game into that. If this is the second list, work out what your first list feels weak against.
2) Pick a caster that seems to have some tools to deal with whatever is needed, as per question 1. Looks at their abilities/spells/feat to gauge how they'll do.
3) Look at the themes, are there any that will help the caster you've chosen deal with the match ups you're aiming for? However, don't feel you have to play in theme, even now. Khador especially still has some combinations that make out of theme play very tempting.
4) You now have a goal, a caster and a theme (or not). What armies are you likely to see on the other side of the table as a Khador player? Think about what you're opponent is going to be looking at and have a think about how their faction will deal with the problems you are presenting.
5) Start adding jacks, units and any other key models that helps the list in the match ups. Don't add stuff like utility solos yet, you want to flesh out the main body of the list first.
6) You should now have most of the list. Look at what the list still feels weak agaisnt with regards to what you expect to see and look at adding some small units or solos that help in these areas. This is where you get a bit more focussed. Look at things like mechaniks, Saxon, Orin, Eiryss, eliminators etc. Make sure they add to the aims of the list, you don't just chuck a solo in because you like them.
7) Play the list against anything at all. Take a note of what each model/unit does in the game and ideally write yourself a battle report. Did each model contribute as you expected? Is there something else you could have in the list instead that will perform better?
8) Make small changes, if needed. Change a solo out, swap a devastator for a destroyer, that sort of thing. Don't make sweeping changes to the list, and try to change one thing between each game instead of lots of things at once.
9) Keep playing it into everything you can! Find the strengths/weaknesses or little interactions that you'll only get from playing the list a bunch. Even if you think something will be a bad match up try it anyway, see how the list does.
10) Go back to the beginning. Does your list meet it's goal? How does you're second list now compare? Do they cover everything between them?
As a general note, I see a lot of lists that tech for a particular problem within a faction, but not the rest of the faction. The typical one right now is worrying about Ghost Fleet, but the list can't deal with Dark Host. Try to make a list that covers the faction where possible, and if you have to have a list to cover one match up try to make it as solid as possible into the rest of the faction.
Hopefully that's a good starting point! If it's useful I could try taking one of my current/future lists and running it through that process as an example?
Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
Post by Netherby on Sept 15, 2017 9:00:03 GMT
Well it all started out a while back when I saw Ghost Fleet and the Dark Host on CID. I knew that a Cryx drop was going to be needed in the future and I felt that OW1 would have a chance to shine against them. So I'v gone through a lot of list iterations, where the last list I played actually had none of the models in it that my original list did other than the caster... I haven't actually had a chance to play it into Ghost Fleet or Dark Host. Every time I'v brought the list out it's been played into other factions, mostly Cygnar, Menoth, Trolls and a Skorne. Each time I'v felt that the list struggled with something and so made changes but I continue to be disappointed with the performance. I'm really feeling the problem is the caster
|
|
|
Post by thebuoyancyofwater on Sept 15, 2017 9:08:20 GMT
The problem might be simply that you're playing the list into things it wasn't designed for in that case. While I did say above that you want to be playing it into everythnig to practice the list, you do also need to play it into the things it wants to see in order to check it works as intended.
What's your other list? Sounds like instead of changing OW1 you might be narrowing down on what list two needs to deal with, namely Cygnar, Menoth, Trolls and Skorne. However, I could see an argument for honing the OW1 list to play into Trolls due to the feat being useful against their infantry.
So, with that in mind, what's your other list? Actually, how do they both stand just now?
Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
Post by Armchair Warrior on Sept 15, 2017 11:55:09 GMT
I'm really feeling the problem is the caster No, no, no. Now you're back to step 1. Until you admit the problem is you, you can't even get to step 2. This is called Special Snowflake Syndrome. If you've designed list to play into Cryx, reach out to a local Cryx player to arrange a game. That is, in fact, on you. If you want to pair OW1 as an offlist caster to handle certain matchups (and although this puts you in the minority it's not necessarily unworkable for competitive play), figure out your other go-to list and pack both in you bag for game night. You can do it! We can help!
|
|
wendan
Junior Strategist
Posts: 785
|
Post by wendan on Sept 15, 2017 15:53:55 GMT
I don't see the problem here!
|
|
|
Post by smoothcriminal on Sept 15, 2017 17:20:35 GMT
If you take list because you like it, just take it. If you don't like the list and still take it, there's some personal issue to figure out here.
|
|
|
Post by pyr0maniacal on Sept 16, 2017 12:04:45 GMT
I play what I like, too. But I'll reliably lose to anyone who knows what they're doing. Such is being an infrequent player.
|
|