|
|
Post by sand20go on Aug 24, 2017 17:40:42 GMT
Today's insider. Now feat effects D3+5 MODELS. So, for example, I pity the Haley player that thought they were getting away with being "that guy" into LOS or even a compentent Hark load out.
He is still a great toolbox but now she will have a challenge playing the long attrition game.
Seiger2+Gravediggers does look really solid. I may need to find me some OW dojo cause sending scappy through a mass of them sounds uber fun.
|
|
Ganso
Junior Strategist
Posts: 932 
|
Post by Ganso on Aug 24, 2017 17:59:20 GMT
Huh, against low model count armies there shouldn't be much of a difference. Against the resurgence of infantry armies though, yikes  Also... I don't post stuff like this often so I apologize in advance, but the fact that Lances charge at POW 16 and stick around to swing a POW 14 2 Inch weapon make my Uhlans feel inadequate when they also charge at POW 16 but only swing a POW 10 1 inch wet noodle   |
|
|
|
Post by sand20go on Aug 24, 2017 18:05:36 GMT
Huh, against low model count armies there shouldn't be much of a difference. Against the resurgence of infantry armies though, yikes Also... I don't post stuff like this often so I apologize in advance, but the fact that Lances charge at POW 16 and stick around to swing a POW 14 2 Inch weapon make my Uhlans feel inadequate when they also charge at POW 16 but only swing a POW 10 1 inch wet noodle Maybe the Uhlans will get a power creep? And that is what I am suggesting about infantry armies. While it will continue to be a pain against say Hark Jack spam Haley2 is now on her backheels against, for example, Stark LOS. |
|
|
|
Post by tapecrawler on Aug 24, 2017 18:07:46 GMT
It's okay Ganso, the whole Lance rule that doesn't effect Storm LANCES is just silly.
|
|
|
|
Post by welshhoppo on Aug 24, 2017 18:17:04 GMT
Uhlans should get AP!
I'm glad H2 is hit. It really ups the viability of Legion of Steel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Soul Samurai on Aug 24, 2017 19:13:05 GMT
Oh jeez, better stay away from the Cygnar forums for a few weeks...
|
|
wags
Junior Strategist
Posts: 102
|
Post by wags on Aug 24, 2017 19:16:13 GMT
Thing is she's still good. Her spell list is still great and you can still stranglehold a battle group with her feat. Just now she has to make actual choices about what to disable and not just take away your whole army for a turn.
|
|
|
|
Post by tapecrawler on Aug 24, 2017 19:40:05 GMT
I agree Wags. What I'm looking forward to is all the teenage angst over Haley2 being unplayable garbage now. I wonder how many Cygnar players are going to rage quit since their darling warcaster has been brought down to the S - level? 😂
|
|
|
|
Post by smoothcriminal on Aug 24, 2017 19:43:52 GMT
So LegoS should just murder H2 now, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by maleficoru on Aug 24, 2017 19:46:52 GMT
Cygnar facebook group is pretty good entertainment right now, heck there is even one guy taking shots at poor Will |
|
|
|
Post by welshhoppo on Aug 24, 2017 20:26:02 GMT
So LegoS should just murder H2 now, right? It's a lot better. She'd have to kill Markov and then feat on the front line to cause issues. Against low model armies she's still really good, but against the new infantry spam she's worse. which is very good, because she could literally win spread the net 9/10 times. |
|
kaos
Junior Strategist
Posts: 268
|
Post by kaos on Aug 24, 2017 21:11:52 GMT
Winter guard command with rockets eevrywhere looks also super effective. As long as you can take out thorn, looks like she is quite Firetrucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by zerosequence on Aug 24, 2017 21:45:02 GMT
It actually makes I2 LoS a lot more viable because she can't just stall your whole army and blow it up.
But it's still really good against low model count armies or those that use cheap screens to escort their good models. I'd shave my beard to have that feat in Khador.
They need to up Vlad2s feat to D3 + 5 so the feats can cancel each other out lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by thebuoyancyofwater on Aug 25, 2017 13:52:32 GMT
They need to up Vlad2s feat to D3 + 5 so the feats can cancel each other out lol. Totally agree  |
|
