smoth
Junior Strategist
Posts: 156
|
Post by smoth on Apr 23, 2019 20:25:53 GMT
Just curious, how does 3 years of development compare to 3 years of playtesting? My thoughts exactly. Historically PP saying "we've been working on it for a long time" isnt a mark of quality. Labor theory pf value is always a bs argument.
|
|
|
Post by Charistoph on Apr 23, 2019 23:56:07 GMT
Cavalry rules are pretty standard. Most of her spells and special rules will have no bearing on her being on a horse, part of a horse, a flying Archon, or a teleporting statue. As I said, if they have 3 years of development, they will have options to play with.
Just curious, how does 3 years of development compare to 3 years of playtesting? It doesn't, it usually includes some of it, but that wasn't the point. They have a general idea of where they are going to take her, and they can bring those rules in to play when they have a model. PP is probably very aware of GW's Chapterhouse case, after all.
|
|
Xintas
Junior Strategist
Posts: 824
|
Post by Xintas on Apr 24, 2019 13:29:12 GMT
It was mostly a joke, but I think the point is that based on what they have said in the past, her winning Warmadness and them confirming something we've known for three years feels bad.
|
|