|
Post by jonnyboy on Nov 14, 2018 3:32:06 GMT
A common list building technique everyone talks about is 'pivot and sweep'. Sweepers hit hard on a specific thing, vlad1 rockets is a good example i think. Pivot lists are there to play into bad matchups for your sweeper list.
These are pretty general ideas, but i've struggled with them in Khador. I can point out our sweeper lists pretty handily. Vlad1 rockets, vlad2 AC (especially with demos), and irusk2 dude spam come to mind.
When i think pivot, i think A+H, control casters, and spriggan. Models that counter particular hardships our sweeper lists would face. Which usually leaves a lot up in the air.
WGK and AC are a much talked about pairing. Can we discuss why, and what casters fit into the sweeper or pivot roll?
To start off, sweepers being Karchev/Harkevich jack spam, irusk2 dude spam, vlad1 rocket spam, vlad2 AC. As for pivot casters I've been looking at butcher 3, ow1, sorscha1, zerkova1. Interestingly enough these casters are our most notable casters.
|
|
|
Post by hocestbellum on Nov 14, 2018 9:32:57 GMT
By the beard of Harkevich not this rubbish again. Remind me how misapplying terms from an entirely unrelated game system came about?
|
|
|
Post by jonnyboy on Nov 14, 2018 12:57:22 GMT
By the beard of Harkevich not this rubbish again. Remind me how misapplying terms from an entirely unrelated game system came about? Sorry terminology upsets you so, but i don't see it as that big of a deal. Now if you'd like to sell your own terminology start marketing. I'm more interested in discussing Khador pairing design. We can refer to your hard hitting list as Grey Goose and your cover list as Dos Equis if that's more soothing.
|
|
|
Post by hocestbellum on Nov 14, 2018 13:28:15 GMT
By the beard of Harkevich not this rubbish again. Remind me how misapplying terms from an entirely unrelated game system came about? Sorry terminology upsets you so, but i don't see it as that big of a deal. Now if you'd like to sell your own terminology start marketing. I'm more interested in discussing Khador pairing design. We can refer to your hard hitting list as Grey Goose and your cover list as Dos Equis if that's more soothing. Yeah, sorry I snapped at you; that was uncalled for on my part. Shouldn't post before my morning cuppa. I'll have a brew now and post more sensibly. But I really dislike this mentality of question lists and pivots and sweepers
|
|
|
Post by hocestbellum on Nov 14, 2018 14:41:50 GMT
Right, tea in hand.
Basically, this is a very complex tactical game that we're involved in, and I dislike this continual effort to dumb it down to catchphrases and simple philosophies. I feel like you are intentionally limiting your own listbuilding by doing so.
And on top of that, I find the idea that covering the weakness of a list with a different list is inherently flawed. A pivot works in pokemon because you can switch them in. It doesn't work in WM/H because you can't. You don't get to see which of the two lists your opponent is going to play, so you end up in the whole list-chicken situation. If you over-specialise your lists, sometimes you'll just call the coin-flip wrong and lose.
Look at the examples you've given. All of them except V2 AC are spam lists. You could also call them 'question lists' if you wanted to use another bit of terminology I dislike. What do you do if your opponent has an answer to your spam/question? Chances are, you lose, particularly if your opponent has flexible lists.
The exception there is V2 AC; I would actually argue that it's Armoured Corps in general. I believe the reason that it's so popular is not that it 'asks questions' or anything; it's that Armoured Corps doesn't insta-lose to much. It's a melee list with really good shooting. It's a slow list that's fast enough to not get jammed out of scenario. It's an infantry list that is immune to most infantry hate by dint of being multi-wound.
So many of its weaknesses can be answered by list options instead of casters, which means it has a very wide stable of casters that can run it.
That's also the reason I think WGK is a better jack theme than Jaws: The weaknesses of Khador jack spam is that they're slow, liable to get swarmed, and we tend to be light on focus. WGK gives you both juniors, incredible infantry hate, and advanced moves. On top of that it makes your caster even harder to kill.
So as to the actual topic of pivots and sweepers; don't. Just make flexible lists. Spam might make you win some matches before the models even hit the table, but you'll lose some in the same way.
I genuinely believe you'll do better if you try to cover weaknesses of a list with the list itself. Some lists will always be stronger than others at certain things, but as long as you remove as many auto-lose conditions as you can you'll do fine.
|
|
|
Post by Netherby on Nov 14, 2018 22:59:39 GMT
I don't think Khador is in a great position to use the 'pivot & sweep' strategy. They just don't currently have meta defining list choices available.
You could easily apply it to Cryx though. Actually a lot of Cryx players are already doing it, even if they aren't aware of the idea from other systems.
|
|
|
Post by jonnyboy on Nov 15, 2018 4:27:47 GMT
I like a lot of your points hocest, and Netherby, that is the feeling I continually get when making lists. Many of the lists I make tend to be 'generalist' that attempt to cover their own weaknesses. This then leads to overlap between lists, which is not terrible in its own right. This does end up feeling like a bit of wasted space in a list pairing. Having a catch all/pivot/cover list is a solid concept, incorporeal is a great example. Not withstanding the new Greylord adjunct, magic weapons are the easiest example to discuss as we have not had easy access. It would also seem a bit ridiculous to include A+H in two lists, but including them in your pair to play into a possible incorporeal matchup seems necessary. I also included Sorscha1 and B3 as casters that would fit the bill of a cover list. Mainly because even in a bad matchup both of those casters can make game winning plays. So maybe Khador doesn't fit the bill for 'pivot/sweep', but I still think there is a take away for having a list that you can drop and always have at least a 50/50 shot of winning.
|
|