Munindk
Junior Strategist
Posts: 210
|
Post by Munindk on Nov 15, 2018 8:46:01 GMT
To sum up the last page or so:
1. TAC are too slow in mercs. 2. TAC can almost be fast enough in Khador, but are not cost efficient.
Are they worth using with the Siege Crawler for protection?
|
|
shoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 706
|
Post by shoe on Nov 15, 2018 13:36:52 GMT
To sum up the last page or so: 1. TAC are too slow in mercs. 2. TAC can almost be fast enough in Khador, but are not cost efficient. Are they worth using with the Siege Crawler for protection? dey aint dat bad if dey come back. but u can spend dem points better and wid dubble frog guards u wont be repelenishing ur tac
|
|
Xintas
Junior Strategist
Posts: 824
|
Post by Xintas on Nov 15, 2018 17:27:57 GMT
I personally like a unit of TAC in irregulars Ossrum as it gives him another option for replenishment and gives him a few more tricks, but shoe is absolutely right. They are suboptimal in every configuration; I just like them.
As far as the cost/getting their boxes back goes, I think it's very unlikely. PP seemed comfortable giving us a 3 box 9 point unit (TGM) with no ready access to tough/replenishment, so a functioning 7 point unit with easy access to both seems to be well in line with what they think is good.
|
|
shoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 706
|
Post by shoe on Nov 15, 2018 17:40:32 GMT
I personally like a unit of TAC in irregulars Ossrum as it gives him another option for replenishment and gives him a few more tricks, but shoe is absolutely right. They are suboptimal in every configuration; I just like them. As far as the cost/getting their boxes back goes, I think it's very unlikely. PP seemed comfortable giving us a 3 box 9 point unit (TGM) with no ready access to tough/replenishment, so a functioning 7 point unit with easy access to both seems to be well in line with what they think is good. 7 pt 3 box non char units are an arkytype. liek satyxass gun gunners and doonias not
|
|
sorokin
Junior Strategist
Posts: 775
|
Post by sorokin on Nov 15, 2018 19:30:43 GMT
I personally like a unit of TAC in irregulars Ossrum as it gives him another option for replenishment and gives him a few more tricks, but shoe is absolutely right. They are suboptimal in every configuration; I just like them. As far as the cost/getting their boxes back goes, I think it's very unlikely. PP seemed comfortable giving us a 3 box 9 point unit (TGM) with no ready access to tough/replenishment, so a functioning 7 point unit with easy access to both seems to be well in line with what they think is good. 7 pt 3 box non char units are an arkytype. liek satyxass gun gunners and doonias not What's with you obession of trying to squeeze "ass" into almost everything?
|
|
shoe
Junior Strategist
Posts: 706
|
Post by shoe on Nov 15, 2018 19:42:17 GMT
that was just a typo
|
|
Xintas
Junior Strategist
Posts: 824
|
Post by Xintas on Nov 15, 2018 21:15:58 GMT
An online post has never made me this happy. I just burst out laughing at work. Thanks a lot.
|
|
sorokin
Junior Strategist
Posts: 775
|
Post by sorokin on Nov 15, 2018 21:58:08 GMT
My bad, I should have seen it for what it is!
|
|
|
Post by Charistoph on Nov 15, 2018 23:18:44 GMT
My bad, I should have seen it for what it is! Well, when you're already talking about a unit known for their racks, it's easy to get confused.
|
|
Munindk
Junior Strategist
Posts: 210
|
Post by Munindk on Nov 16, 2018 7:31:39 GMT
They're unlikely to get faster, so maybe we should look at getting smoke bombs replaced by something else? Would wall of fire be too much?
|
|